Skip to main content Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Initiatives
  • Updates
  • Contact
  • In The Media
  • Jobs
  • Support Us
September 10, 2024

Kentucky

State Senate: Republican majority
State House: Republican majority
Governor: Andy Beshear (D)
Attorney General: Russell Coleman (R)

Summary:

With supermajorities in both chambers, Kentucky Republicans have dominated the state legislature. Interestingly, however, the governor’s mansion and attorney general’s office are a different story, as both have recently or are currently occupied by Democrats.

The legislature has considered many bills similar to other states in this term, including proposals to strengthen free speech protections on college campuses, limit social media censorship, prohibit the use of social credit scores, and require age verification for websites with sexual material. However the only relevant bill to advance recently was an effort to limit the use of generative-AI in elections, which passed the Senate in February.

Previous Attorney General Daniel Cameron and current Attorney General Russell Coleman have joined multi-state coalitions of Republican AGs on amicus briefs and have sent letters to Eventbrite and Chase Bank opposing censorship actions.

Key Policymakers:

  • Sen. Robert Mills [R], Sen. Phillip Wheeler [R], Sen. Gerald Neal [D]
  • Rep. Savannah Maddox [R]

Legislative Activity:

SB 258: The New Voices Act. Provides additional free speech protections for student journalists and student media advisors; requires each district to adopt a written policy for time, place, and manner restrictions and for an appeals procedure; provide that student speech not be considered school speech; provides that a student journalist or student media advisor may seek injunctive relief. Introduced by Sen. Gerald Neal [D] in February 2024 but has not advanced. 

HB 224: Protecting free speech for public college students and faculty. A bill to require an institution to adopt a policy to not restrict off-campus speech; extend free speech protections to the public; provide that student religious and political organizations shall be afforded equal access to facilities; provide that authority vested with a student organization to distribute student organization funding shall be contingent on viewpoint-neutral distribution of those funds; reduce institution’s authority to establish permit requirements; specify how an institution defines student-on-student harassment; waive immunity for claims brought under the Act; permit disciplinary action against a faculty member or administrator that knowingly and intentionally restricts the protected speech of another; suspend the distribution authority of a student organization that does not distribute student organization funding in accordance with the Act; prohibit retaliation against campus community members; require Council on Postsecondary Education to develop free speech instructional materials and model trainings for institutions; require institutions to present free speech instructional materials and trainings to designated individuals; require institutions to publish semiannual student organization funding reports; designate the required contents of the semiannual student organization funding report; and create a new section of KRS Chapter 164 to limit the jurisdiction of an institution over associations, groups, or organizations not affiliated with the institutions. Republican-only bill introduced by Rep. Savannah Maddox [R] in January 2024 but has not progressed. 

HB 539/ SB 111 (2021): Limiting social media censorship. Establishing that the owner or operator of a social media Web site is subject to a private cause of action by a social media Web site user in Kentucky under specified conditions; establish entitlement to damages, including the award of reasonable attorney fees and costs; specify that hate speech shall not constitute a defense to violation of this Act; authorize the Attorney General to bring an action on behalf of a social media Web site user; establish a violation under deceptive trade practices; provide exceptions for deletion or censoring of certain types of speech. Introduced by Rep. Norma Kirk-McCormick [R] Sen. Phillip Wheeler [R] and Sen. Robert Mills [R] in January 2021 but did not progress. 

SB 82/ HB 325 (2022): Limits the power of social media platforms to remove candidates during elections; creates fine for wrongful deplatforming; require that social media platforms share their requirements for deplatforming and provide an opt-out option for shadow banning and algorithm use; require antitrust measures to be taken if shadow banning practices are not in line with requirements. Introduced by Sen. Phillip Wheeler [R], Sen. Robert Mills [R] and Rep. Melinda Prunty [R] in January 2022 but did not progress.

HB 450: Limiting social media access by minors. Prohibits social media companies from allowing minors to create accounts without parental consent; provide means for establishing age and providing parental consent; prohibit retention of personal information obtained through consent process; require social media companies to provide parents with means for account supervision; authorize the Attorney General to enforce through administrative and judicial action; establish a private civil cause of action for creation of minor social media account without consent or retention of personal information obtained through consent process. Republican-only bill introduced by Rep. Nicolas Wilson [R] in February 2024 but has not progressed. 

HR 63 (2022): Resolution to express support for the State of Israel and opposition to the international Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. Republican-only resolution introduced by Rep. Kimberly Moser [R] in February 2022 but did not progress.

HB 779 (2022): A bill to prohibit the use of social credit scores, prohibit the violation of an individual’s constitutional rights based on predictive behavior analysis, and prohibit the use of social credit scores in lending and investing. Introduced by Rep. Savannah Maddox [R] in March 2022 but did not progress. 

SB 131 (Signed into Law): Limiting use of generative AI in election communications. Defines electioneering communication, information content provider, interactive computer service, sponsor, and synthetic media, establishes a cause of action for the use of synthetic media in an electioneering communication, establishes an affirmative defense that the electioneering communication includes a conspicuous disclosure, provides that the sponsor of the electioneering communication may be held liable, but the medium is not liable, except in certain circumstances. Bipartisan bill introduced by Sen. Amanda Mays Bledsoe [R] and Sen. Gerald Neal [D] in January 2024 and passed the Senate with a unanimous vote in February.

HB 241/ SB 276: Limiting access to content harmful to minors. Declares legislative findings relating to pornography; defines terms; establishes a civil cause of action against any commercial entity that publishes matter harmful to minors on the internet without obtaining age verification; requires removal of personal data following review for access. Republican-only bill introduced by Rep. Shane Baker [R] and Sen. Lindsey Tichenor [R] in January 2024 but did not progress.

Legal Actions:

AG Cameron Leads 19 States in Urging Chase to Stop Discriminating Against Customers Based on Religion, Political Affiliation: On May 2, 2023, former Attorney General Daniel Cameron led a coalition of 19 states in sending a letter to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Chase) urging the company to stop discriminating against customers due to their religious beliefs or political affiliations. In their letter, the attorneys general argue that Chase “has not extended its openness and inclusivity to everyone,” and points out the company’s pattern of targeting and denying service to religious and conservative-leaning customers, like the National Committee for Religious Freedom. The coalition’s letter also calls for greater transparency in how the bank treats viewpoint diversity. After a report revealed Chase has “unclear or imprecise policies” that allow it to “deny service for arbitrary or politically biased reasons,” the bank faced backlash from shareholders and outside groups for refusing to disclose and investigate such policies. The coalition calls on Chase “to stop its religious and politically biased discrimination and start living up to its commitment to an inclusive society where everyone feels welcomed, equal, and included.” 

Multi-State letter to Eventbrite Opposing Cancellation of Chloe Cole Event: On October 20, 2023, in a letter to Eventbrite General Counsel Julia Taylor, AG Coleman joined coalition of 19 attorneys general knocked the San Francisco-based event management and ticketing website for deplatforming an event featuring Chloe Cole. Cole, a California resident, believed she was transgender and began receiving puberty blockers at 13 and cross-sex hormones not long after. At 15, she underwent a double mastectomy. By age 16, she overcame her gender dysphoria, but was left with the permanent effects of prior treatments. She now seeks to prevent future tragedies by warning others about the dangers of so-called “gender transition procedures.” But according to Eventbrite, Chloe’s personal story “violates [its] policy on ‘Hateful, Dangerous, or Violent Content and Events.’” The attorneys general conclude by demanding that Eventbrite stop silencing political dissidents and adopt event-screening policies that are unbiased and respectful of free speech.

Multi-state Amicus Brief in NRA v Vullo. On Jan. 18, 2024 Attorney General Russell Coleman joined 22 other state attorneys general in filing an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the National Rifle Association (NRA) and ultimately the First and Second Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The NRA’s lawsuit concerns troubling allegations of governmental abuse of power by a New York official who the NRA claims attempted to financially bully the country’s leading Second Amendment advocacy organization. The Supreme Court ruled in the NRA’s favor in June.

Multi-State Amicus in Netchoice Cases. On Jan. 24, 2024, AG Coleman joined a multistate coalition calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to stop online censorship from Big Tech companies. The attorneys general from 18 states submitted an amicus brief supporting a pair of Texas and Florida laws that protect their citizens from censorship on social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, and YouTube.  The coalition argued that censorship of certain viewpoints threatens the marketplace of ideas and undermines the foundations of democratic governance. The coalition concludes that state laws preventing platforms from censoring speech provide a strong backstop against government censorship, writing that “it is undisputed that the Federal Government, including the White House, has engaged in a years-long, behind-closed-doors campaign to push social media companies to suppress millions of constitutionally protected posts.” In June 2024, the Supreme Court sided with Netchoice and sent the cases back to the lower courts for reconsideration.

 

Return to Free Speech and Censorship Across the U.S. States

Share
Our Latest
    Read More    

Public Comment to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Technology Platform Censorship

May 21, 2025

Federal Awards for “Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation” and other content moderation initiatives, 2010-2025

April 15, 2025

Report: Federal Policy Proposals to Protect Digital Free Speech in the United States

March 3, 2025
    Read More    
In The Media
View All Media

Navigating the Complex World of Digital Rights and Censorship

May 19, 2025

Do Your Own Research: Liber-net’s Misinfo Grant Database

May 5, 2025

America This Week, Monday Night Live Stream

May 5, 2025
View All Media

Network Affects Substack.

Public Comment to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Technology Platform Censorship

May 22, 2025

Where the money went: USG funding to counter-mis/disinformation initiatives

May 1, 2025

How the U.S. government built the anti-disinformation field

April 16, 2025
Led by liber-net founder Andrew Lowenthal, NetworkAffects explores digital authoritarianism - privacy threats, bio-metric ID, surveillance, programmable currencies, and attacks on digital civil liberties and free expression from the ‘anti-disinformation’ and ‘fact-checking’ fields.
Free Speech Rights
5 Min read
Free Speech Rights

Global Free Speech Efforts

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.

Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature from 45 BC, making it over 2000 years old. Richard McClintock, a Latin professor at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, looked up one of the more obscure Latin words, consectetur, from a Lorem Ipsum passage, and going through the cites of the word in classical literature, discovered the undoubtable source. Lorem Ipsum comes from sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 of “de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum” (The Extremes of Good and Evil) by Cicero, written in 45 BC. This book is a treatise on the theory of ethics, very popular during the Renaissance. The first line of Lorem Ipsum, “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..”, comes from a line in section 1.10.32. The standard chunk of Lorem Ipsum used since the 1500s is reproduced below for those interested. Sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 from “de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum” by Cicero are also reproduced in their exact original form, accompanied by English versions from the 1914 translation by H. Rackham.

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using ‘Content here, content here’, making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for ‘lorem ipsum’ will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).

Share

Privacy Policy    |   © 2024 liber-net   |   Website Designed and Developed by Qadra Studio

Home

About Us

Initiatives

Updates

Contact

In The Media

Jobs

Support Us

liber-net Inc is a tax-exempt organization registered under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

Privacy Policy    |   © 2025 liber-net   |   Website designed and developed by Qadra Studio

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

Enter your email address to subscribe
loader